SARMs vs. anabolic steroids: Key differences

Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) and anabolic steroids are both performance-enhancing substances that have gained popularity among athletes and bodybuilders. However, these compounds have distinct characteristics that set them apart. Let’s explore the key differences between SARMs and anabolic steroids.

How it Works?

SARMs work by selectively binding to androgen receptors in specific tissues, primarily muscle and bone.

This targeted approach is designed to minimize effects on other organs. In contrast, anabolic steroids are synthetic derivatives of testosterone that affect multiple systems throughout the body.

Tissue Selectivity

One of the most significant differences is the tissue selectivity of SARMs. They are engineered to target muscle and bone tissue while having minimal impact on other organs.

Anabolic steroids, on the other hand, affect a broader range of tissues, including the prostate, liver, and skin, which can lead to various side effects.  The advantages to using SARMs over Anabolic Steroids is clear.

Side Effects

Due to their selective nature, SARMs are often marketed as having fewer side effects compared to anabolic steroids.

Anabolic steroids are however known to cause a wide range of side effects, including liver damage, cardiovascular issues, and hormonal imbalances.

Legal Status and Regulation

Anabolic steroids are classified as controlled substances in many countries and are illegal without a prescription, however generally legal if being used for research purposes.

SARMs, while not approved for human use, exist in a regulatory gray area. They are often sold as “research chemicals” but are illegal to market as dietary supplements.

Effectiveness

Anabolic steroids have been shown to be highly effective in building muscle mass and strength. While SARMs also promote muscle growth, current research suggests their effects may be less pronounced compared to traditional anabolic steroids

Administration

Most anabolic steroids are typically administered via intramuscular injection, although some oral forms exist. SARMs, on the other hand, are generally taken orally in pill form, making them more convenient for some users

Chemical Structure

SARMs are non-steroidal compounds, meaning they have a different chemical structure from anabolic steroids. This structural difference contributes to their selective binding properties and potentially different risk profiles.

Research and Development

SARMs are relatively new compounds, first developed in the late 1990s. As such, research on their long-term effects is limited. Anabolic steroids have been studied and used for decades, providing a more comprehensive understanding of their effects and risks.

Conclusion

While SARMs and anabolic steroids share some similarities in their muscle-building potential, they differ significantly in their mechanisms of action, tissue selectivity, and risk profiles.